next up previous contents
Next: Convergence Test Up: Faster Integral Calculation Previous: The Bra Concentric Case

The Non-Concentric Case


 
Figure 5.2: The non-concentric case
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{cold2.epsf}

Proceeding in a similar manner to the concentric case, the well-separated approximation is invoked before developing a general formula for Rij:
\begin{align}R_{ij} &= AB x_{i} + DC y_{j} - DB \\
R_{ij}^{2} &= \vert DB\vert^...
... AB\vert\vert DC\vert\cos\phi x_{i}y_{j}+\vert DC\vert^{2}y_{j}^{2};
\end{align}
therefore, the reciprocal of Rij is
\begin{align}\frac{1}{R_{ij}} &= \frac{1}{\vert DB\vert}\left(1-2\frac{\vert AB\...
...a_{i}^{2}+2\alpha_{i}\beta_{j}\cos\phi +\beta_{j}^{2} \right)^{-1/2}
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}\alpha_{i}=\frac{\vert AB\vert}{\vert DB\vert}x_{i} \qquad \qquad \beta_{j}=\frac{\vert DC\vert}{\vert DB\vert}y_{j}
\end{align}
which leads to:
\begin{align}\frac{1}{R_{ij}} &= \frac{1}{\vert DB\vert}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_...
...vert}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} a_{kl}x_{i}^{k}y_{j}^{l}
\end{align}
with
\begin{align}a_{kl} = \left(\frac{\vert AB\vert}{\vert DB\vert}\right)^{k}\left(\frac{\vert DC\vert}{\vert DB\vert}\right)^{l}d_{kl}.
\end{align}

Like the three-center case, the dkl are recursively related, but now there are two recurrence relations, one for increasing k, another for l:
 \begin{align}d_{kl} &= \left(\frac{2k+2l-1}{k}\right)\cos\theta_{x}d_{(k-1)l}-\l...
...\phi d_{(k-1)(l-1)}\nonumber \\
& \qquad \qquad \qquad +d_{(k-2)l}.
\end{align}
The dkl relations are easily converted to relations for the more convenient variable akl. For example, equation (5.41) can become
\begin{align}\left(\frac{\vert AB\vert}{\vert DB\vert}\right)^{k}&\left(\frac{\v...
...^{k}\left(\frac{\vert DC\vert}{\vert DB\vert}\right)^{l-2}d_{k(l-2)}
\end{align}
which leads to the recurrence relations
\begin{align}a_{kl} &= \left(\frac{2k+2l-1}{k}\right) \frac{AB\cdot DB}{\vert DB...
..._{(k-1)(l-1)}+\frac{\vert AB\vert^{2}}{\vert DB\vert^{2}}a_{(k-2)l}.
\end{align}

This general formula is more expensive than the concentric case, but it uses no extra shell-pair information. Also (as a nice check) if AB=0 the relation reduces to the concentric case. The above recurrence relations can also be extended to deal with higher powers of Rij (which are needed for higher momentum (0)(m)s). The argument below shows that only the coefficients are changed:
\begin{align}\left(1-2\alpha_{i}\cos\theta_{x}-2\beta_{j}\cos\theta_{y}+\alpha_{...
...^{\infty}\sum_{l=0}^{\infty} d_{kl}^{(m)}\alpha_{i}^{k}\beta_{j}^{l}
\end{align}

\begin{align}d_{kl}^{(m)} &= \left(\frac{2k+2l+m}{k}\right)\cos\theta_{x}d_{(k-1...
...\frac{2k+m}{l}\right)\cos\phi d_{(k-1)(l-1)}^{(m)}+d_{(k-2)l}^{(m)}.
\end{align}
For example, the first relation in the Rij-3 expansion (m=1) is
\begin{align}a_{kl} &= \left(\frac{2k+2l+1}{k}\right)\frac{AB \cdot DB}{\vert DB...
..._{(k-1)(l-1)}+\frac{\vert DC\vert^{2}}{\vert DB\vert^{2}}a_{k(l-2)}.
\end{align}


next up previous contents
Next: Convergence Test Up: Faster Integral Calculation Previous: The Bra Concentric Case
Ross D. Adamson
1999-01-27